Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Reddit Email

Republish This Article

Close window X

Republish this article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to republish this piece both online and in print, and we encourage you to do so with the embed code provided below. We only ask that you follow a few basic guidelines.  

Stabilizing and reducing U.S. energy consumption

by Leighton Walter Kille, The Journalist's Resource
December 4, 2009

<h1>Stabilizing and reducing U.S. energy consumption</h1> <p class="byline">by Leighton Walter Kille, The Journalist's Resource <br />December 4, 2009</p> <p>While increasing energy efficiency has considerable benefits, significant barriers exist. Efficiency potential is spread throughout millions of individual homes and businesses, requires upfront investments and shows returns only over time. This makes efficiency no one's first priority.</p> <p>A 2008 paper by the Widener University School of Law, <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=957061">"Stabilizing and Then Reducing U.S. Energy Consumption: Legal and Policy Tools for Efficiency and Conservation,"</a> provides a useful guide to realizing the potential benefits of energy efficiency.</p> <p>Policy tools suggested by the paper include:</p> <ul> <li>Raising appliance and equipment efficiency standards. Since 1990 existing programs such as Energy Star have helped reduce annual carbon emissions by an amount equal to 4% of the U.S. carbon emissions that year and provided a net savings to the U.S. economy.</li> <li>Improving efficiency in existing residential and commercial buildings. Of the efficiency potential, the 2009 McKinsey report indicates that the residential sector accounts for 35% and the commercial sector 25%.</li> <li>Raising the required corporate average fuel economy (CAFE). Such regulations have already increased the average fuel economy of U.S. cars from 18 miles per gallon in 1978 to 27.5 miles per gallon in 1990.</li> <li>Updating the U.S. gasoline taxes, which effectively raise the cost of gas and act immediately to encourage efficient use.</li> <li>Providing more transportation options for both individuals and businesses. These include an expansion of energy-efficient rail freight and transportation-oriented development.</li> <li>Using tools such as regional transmissions organizations, public benefit funds and variable rate tariffs to encourage competition and efficiency in electricity generation, transmission and consumption.</li> </ul> <p>Used together, such tools have the potential of stabilizing U.S. energy consumption in the next several decades, the author states. Such a stabilization would provide considerable savings as well as environmental benefits.</p> <p>A related study by McKinsey &amp; Company, <a href="http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/electricpowernaturalgas/US_energy_efficiency/">"Unlocking Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Economy,"</a> looks at the potential benefits of reducing energy consumption.</p> <p><em>Tags: carbon, emissions, global warming, greenhouse gases, technology, infrastructure</em><em>, conservation, cars<br /> </em></p> <p>This &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;https://journalistsresource.org/environment/stabilizing-and-then-reducing-u-s-energy-consumption/&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; first appeared on &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;https://journalistsresource.org&quot;&gt;The Journalist&#039;s Resource&lt;/a&gt; and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.&lt;img src=&quot;https://journalistsresource.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/cropped-jr-favicon-150x150.png&quot; style=&quot;width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;&quot;&gt;</p> Copy to Clipboard

1

While increasing energy efficiency has considerable benefits, significant barriers exist. Efficiency potential is spread throughout millions of individual homes and businesses, requires upfront investments and shows returns only over time. This makes efficiency no one’s first priority.

A 2008 paper by the Widener University School of Law, “Stabilizing and Then Reducing U.S. Energy Consumption: Legal and Policy Tools for Efficiency and Conservation,” provides a useful guide to realizing the potential benefits of energy efficiency.

Policy tools suggested by the paper include:

• Raising appliance and equipment efficiency standards. Since 1990 existing programs such as Energy Star have helped reduce annual carbon emissions by an amount equal to 4% of the U.S. carbon emissions that year and provided a net savings to the U.S. economy.
• Improving efficiency in existing residential and commercial buildings. Of the efficiency potential, the 2009 McKinsey report indicates that the residential sector accounts for 35% and the commercial sector 25%.
• Raising the required corporate average fuel economy (CAFE). Such regulations have already increased the average fuel economy of U.S. cars from 18 miles per gallon in 1978 to 27.5 miles per gallon in 1990.
• Updating the U.S. gasoline taxes, which effectively raise the cost of gas and act immediately to encourage efficient use.
• Providing more transportation options for both individuals and businesses. These include an expansion of energy-efficient rail freight and transportation-oriented development.
• Using tools such as regional transmissions organizations, public benefit funds and variable rate tariffs to encourage competition and efficiency in electricity generation, transmission and consumption.

Used together, such tools have the potential of stabilizing U.S. energy consumption in the next several decades, the author states. Such a stabilization would provide considerable savings as well as environmental benefits.

A related study by McKinsey & Company, “Unlocking Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Economy,” looks at the potential benefits of reducing energy consumption.

Tags: carbon, emissions, global warming, greenhouse gases, technology, infrastructure, conservation, cars