#### Research

# Statistical terms used in research studies: A primer for media

#### Tags: April 7, 2015

| Last updated:#### Last updated: April 7, 2015

When assessing academic studies, media members are often confronted by pages not only full of numbers, but also loaded with concepts such as “selection bias,” “p-value” and “statistical inference.”

Statistics courses are available at most universities, of course, but are often viewed as something to be taken, passed and quickly forgotten. However, for media members and public communicators of many kinds it is imperative to do more than just read study abstracts; understanding the methods and concepts that underpin academic studies is essential to being able to judge the merits of a particular piece of research. Even if one can’t master statistics, knowing the basic language can help in formulating better, more critical questions for experts, and it can foster deeper thinking, and skepticism, about findings.

Further, the emerging field of data journalism requires that reporters bring more analytical rigor to the increasingly large amounts of numbers, figures and data they use. Grasping some of the academic theory behind statistics can help ensure that rigor.

Most studies attempt to establish a **correlation **between two variables — for example, how having good teachers might be “associated with” (a phrase often used by academics) better outcomes later in life; or how the weight of a car is associated with fatal collisions. But detecting such a relationship is only a first step; the ultimate goal is to determine **causation**: that one of the two variables drives the other. There is a time-honored phrase to keep in mind: “Correlation is not causation.” (This can be usefully amended to “correlation is not *necessarily* causation,” as the nature of the relationship needs to be determined.)

Another key distinction to keep in mind is that studies can either explore observed data (**descriptive statistics**) or use observed data to predict what is true of areas beyond the data (**inferential statistics**). The statement “From 2000 to 2005, 70% of the land cleared in the Amazon and recorded in Brazilian government data was transformed into pasture” is a descriptive statistic; “Receiving your college degree increases your lifetime earnings by 50%” is an inferential statistic.

Here are some other basic statistical concepts with which journalism students and working journalists should be familiar:

- A
**sample**is a portion of an entire**population**. Inferential statistics seek to make predictions about a population based on the results observed in a sample of that population. - There are two primary types of population samples:
**random**and**stratified**. For a random sample, study subjects are chosen completely by chance, while a stratified sample is constructed to reflect the characteristics of the population at large (gender, age or ethnicity, for example). There are a wide range of sampling methods, each with its advantages and disadvantages. - Attempting to extend the results of a sample to a population is called
**generalization**. This can be done only when the sample is truly representative of the entire population. - Generalizing results from a sample to the population must take into account
**sample variation**. Even if the sample selected is completely random, there is still a degree of**variance**within the population that will require your results from within a sample to include a**margin of error**. For example, the results of a poll of likely voters could give the margin of error in percentage points: “47% of those polled said they would vote for the measure, with a margin of error of 3 percentage points.” Thus, if the actual percentage voting for the measure was as low as 44% or as high as 50%, this result would be consistent with the poll. - The greater the sample size, the more representative it tends to be of a population as a whole. Thus the margin of error falls and the
**confidence level**rises. - Most studies explore the relationship between two variables — for example, that prenatal exposure to pesticides is associated with lower birthweight. This is called the
**alternative hypothesis**. Well-designed studies seek to disprove the**null hypothesis**— in this case, that prenatal pesticide exposure is*not*associated with lower birthweight. - Significance tests of the study’s results determine the probability of seeing such results if the null hypothesis were true; the p-value indicates how unlikely this would be. If the p-value is 0.05, there is only a 5% probability of seeing such “interesting” results if the null hypothesis were true; if the p-value is 0.01, there is only a 1% probability.
- The other threat to a sample’s validity is the notion of
**bias**. Bias comes in many forms but most common bias is based on the selection of subjects. For example, if subjects self-select into a sample group, then the results are no longer**externally valid,**as the type of person who wants to be in a study is not necessarily similar to the population that we are seeking to draw inference about. - When two variables move together, they are said to be
**correlated**.**Positive correlation**means that as one variable rises or falls, the other does as well — caloric intake and weight, for example**. Negative correlation**indicates that two variables move in opposite directions — say, vehicle speed and travel time. So if a scholar writes “Income is negatively correlated with poverty rates,” what he or she means is that as income rises, poverty rates fall. **Causation**is when change in one variable alters another. For example, air temperature and sunlight are correlated (when the sun is up, temperatures rise), but causation flows in only one direction. This is also known as**cause and effect**.**Regression analysis**is a way to determine if there is or isn’t a correlation between two (or more) variables and how strong any correlation may be. At its most basic, this involves plotting data points on a X/Y axis (in our example cited above, vehicle weight and fatal accidents) looking for the**average causal effect**. This means looking at how the graph’s dots are distributed and establishing a**trend line**. Again, correlation isn’t necessarily causation.- The
**correlation coefficient**is a measure of linear association or clustering around a line. - While causation is sometimes easy to prove, frequently it can often be difficult because of
**confounding variables**(unknown factors that affect the two variables being studied). Studies require well-designed and executed experiments to ensure that the results are reliable. - When causation has been established, the factor that drives change (in the above example, sunlight) is the
**independent variable**. The variable that is driven is the**dependent variable**. **Elasticity**, a term frequently used in economics studies, measures how much a change in one variable affects another. For example, if the price of vegetables rises 10% and consumers respond by cutting back purchases by 10%, the expenditure elasticity is 1.0 — the increase in price equals the drop in consumption. But if purchases fall by 15%, the elasticity is 1.5, and consumers are said to be “price sensitive” for that item. If consumption were to fall only 5%, the elasticity is 0.5 and consumers are “price insensitive” — a rise in price of a certain amount doesn’t reduce purchases to the same degree.**Standard deviation**provides insight into how much variation there is within a group of values. It measures the deviation (difference) from the group’s mean (average).- Be careful to distinguish the following terms as you interpret results:
**Average**,**mean**and**median**. The first two terms are synonymous, and refer to the average value of a group of numbers. Add up all the figures, divide by the number of values, and that’s the average or mean. A median, on the other hand, is the central value, and can be useful if there’s an extremely high or low value in a collection of values — say, a Wall Street CEO’s salary in a list of people’s incomes. (For more information, read “Math for Journalists” or go to one of the “related resources” at right.) - Pay close attention to percentages versus percentage points — they’re not the same thing. For example, if 40 out of 100 homes in a distressed suburb have “underwater” mortgages, the rate is 40%. If a new law allows 10 homeowners to refinance, now only 30 mortgages are troubled. The new rate is 30%, a drop of 10 percentage points (40 – 30 = 10). This is
*not*10% less than the old rate, however — in fact, the decrease is 25% (10 / 40 = 0.25 = 25%). - In descriptive statistics,
**quantiles**can be used to divide data into equal-sized subsets. For example, dividing a list of individuals sorted by height into two parts — the tallest and the shortest — results in two quantiles, with the median height value as the dividing line.**Quartiles**separate data set into four equal-sized groups,**deciles**into 10 groups, and so forth. Individual items can be described as being “in the upper decile,” meaning the group with the largest values, meaning that they are higher than 90% of those in the dataset.

Note that understanding statistical terms isn’t a license to freely salt your stories with them. Always work to present studies’ key findings in clear, jargon-free language. You’ll be doing a service not only for your readers, but also for the researchers.

**Related:** See this more general overview of academic theory and critical reasoning courtesy of MIT’s Stephen Van Evera. A new open, online course offered on Harvard’s EdX platform, “Introduction to Statistics: Inference,” from UC Berkeley professors, explores “statistical ideas and methods commonly used to make valid conclusions based on data from random samples.”

There are also a number of free online statistics tutorials available, including one from Stat Trek and another from Experiment Resources. Stat Trek also offer a glossary that provides definitions of common statistical terms. Another useful resource is “Harnessing the Power of Statistics,” a chapter in *The New Precision Journalism*.

———————-

*A special thanks to Sudhakar* *Raju of Rockhurst University for his invaluable contributions to this article. Keywords: training*

# 25 comments

roberto smeraldi

John Wihbey

Roberto – Thanks for your comments and feedback. I see your point and have amended the example as you suggest for the sake of clarity. That was very nice of you to take the time to write in. We are always looking for good new studies; if you have any to suggest relating to Brazil, please let me know at John_Wihbey@hks.harvard.edu. Much gratitude, John

Lista de termos estatísticos usados em pesquisas (parte 1) - bitcount

[…] blog Journalist’s Resource (de Harvard) publicou recentemente termos de estatística usados em pesquisas, uma espécie de cartilha para jornalistas. Quem precisa […]

Things to read « Kenny Smith | A few words …

[…] Statistics for journalists. Great primer, there. Ten rules for visual storytelling, from Professor Mindy McAdams at Florida. It starts with this: “I want to know more. I always want to know who, when, and where. Always! For me this is part of authentication, which is part of what makes it journalism and not interpretive art. A photo without a caption is not journalism.” […]

Lista de termos estatísticos usados em pesquisas (parte 2) - bitcount

[…] a lista de ontem sobre os termos estatísticos que jornalistas deveriam saber. O post original foi publicado pelo blog Journalist’s Resource e recomendado pelo José Roberto de Toledo. Em […]

Reliable Sources in an Age of Too Much Information - NYTimes.com

[…] site is full of useful background and tools for writers, including a journalist’s primer on statistical terms used in research studies and a short reflection on online research by Alexis Madrigal of The […]

Excellent, succinct post. It will be required reading for my students. Many thanks.

Nicholas Lemann on journalism, scholarship, and more informed reporting

[…] Lemann: I think there are three things. One is some kind of basic statistical literacy. A lot of academic literature has at least some statistics in it. The course I teach in the fall, […]

Jenni

All good, but I thought the section on null hypothesis/p values needed simpler clarification.

Sure, journalists need to know digital tools, but they really need to … | The Research Site

[…] It means every j-school instructor emphasizing sophisticated web search skills, some knowledge of statistical concepts, a familiarity with research databases, and fostering the strong desire for a non-anecdotal, […]

[…] average output elasticity of public capital amounts to 0.106, after correcting for publication bias.” Thus for every […]

[…] designed and rigorously executed, studies should give clear, statistically significant results, even when disproving something. The irony is that, while academic research is intended to […]

[…] improve psychological well-being of recipients and their families; they lead to a 0.18 SD (standard deviation) increase in happiness, a 0.15 SD increase in life satisfaction, and a 0.14 SD reduction in stress, […]

Datenjournalismus im Oktober & September 2013 | Datenjournalist

[…] Übersicht über statistische Begriffe für Journalisten (in […]

[…] that applied to them. (Note that percentage points and percent are not synonymous; our article on statistics for journalists has more […]

[…] who entered the Promise Academy as a result of winning the lottery do 0.4 standard deviations better on math and 0.2 standard deviations better on reading than those who didn’t attend the […]

[…] average, students who visited the art museum performed 9% of a standard deviation higher in their ability to reason critically. These included students’ “observations, […]

[…] higher incomes lagged behind comparable homeowners: Those aged 35 to 44 in the upper-middle income quartile had less than one fifth the median net worth of homeowners, $13,300 compared to […]

Math for journalists Journalist's Resource: Research for Reporting, from Harvard Shorenstein Center

[…] percentages, ratios and other relationships between numbers. You should also understand what margin of error in polling is, have a basic understanding of probability and be able to work with graphs and […]

Mike Love

p-value is not defined as you have it here. e.g., Wikipedia:

“In statistical significance testing, the p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic at least as extreme as the one that was actually observed, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.”

[…] See on journalistsresource.org […]

Great resource. One small point: Bill Gates’s _salary_ is probably a bad example to use in the discussion of average, mean, and median. His salary has never been very high, I believe. Now if you’re talking about capital gains or wealth or overall income, that would be a perfect example for you to cite.

This is a valuable resource. However, I’d make the following changes: 1) There are many more types of sample. Perhaps the most common is “convenience” sample. 2) Regression can be (and usually is) among more than 2 variables.

Despite the above, anything that helps journalists get better information about statistics is a good thing.

Statistical terms used in research studies: A media primer | No Bull

[…] energy sources, analyses of concussions and football, cancer treatments, and more. Check out this great website for a breakdown of some key terms your sources may use when describing their work and academic […]

[…] one standard deviation (2.69) increase in log resource rents per capita leads to approximately a one tenth of a standard […]

Very interesting and very useful post. However, I would like to suggest to use a different example, when it comes to explaining the difference between “descriptive” (in relation to “inferential”) statistics. In fact, both examples used are of “inferential nature”: the difference is that the early one is inferential about the past and the latter is inferential about the future. In order to be a rigorously descriptive one, the early example should spell something like the following:”From 2000 to 2005, 70% of the land cleared in the Amazon was occupied by cattle-ranching” (or “was transformed into pasture”, etc.). By focusing on the possible PURPOSE of those who converted the forest, the conclusion becomes inferential. Actually, the purpose might have been another one, i.e. speculating on land, obtaining access to public subsidies, (failed) attempt to establish crops etc.. So, the fact that deforestation resulted into pasture might be partially “on purpose” and partially not. Sorry for the rather technical comment, but the example is a typical one: I often have to explain to fellow journalists that “resulting use of land over a certain period” is not necessarily “THE cause” for land conversion. And the example helps to show how you can reach inferential conclusions about the past and not just about the future. Right?

Roberto Smeraldi (director, Amigos da Terra – Amazônia Brasileira), Brazil