:::: MENU ::::

Citizen Action, Culture, Elections, Primaries

Do more disabled voters participate in elections because of convenience voting reforms?

Tags: ,


Americans with disabilities are less likely to vote, partly because of the cost or difficulty involved with traveling to a polling place to cast a ballot. Nationwide, an estimated 15.6 million people with disabilities voted in the November 2012 elections, with a number of them reporting having trouble reading or seeing their ballots or understanding how to vote or use voting equipment. A 2013 study funded by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission found that voter turnout for disabled adults was 5.7 percentage points lower than that of people who do not have a mental or physical disability.

Under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, state and local governments are required to ensure that disabled voters have an equal opportunity to participate in the voting process – from registering to vote to submitting ballots. Over the past several decades, government officials have implemented reforms designed to encourage disabled adults and other citizens to vote by making the process simpler and the experience easier. The federal Voting Rights Act of 1965, for example, prohibits state and local governments from requiring people to pass a literacy or writing test or to attain a certain level of education in order to vote. That law also allows a disabled voter to receive assistance from a person of his or her own choosing. The Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act of 1984 requires U.S. polling locations to be physically accessible to physically disabled voters for federal elections, or to make available an alternate method for casting a ballot. The Help America Vote Act of 2002 requires that each polling place that is open during a federal election provide at least one voting system that is accessible to disabled voters. That measure focused specifically on assisting individuals with limited vision.

In addition to enacting these broad laws, state governments also have begun offering “convenience voting” opportunities, or opportunities for voters to submit their ballots before Election Day or outside of polling locations. One popular form of convenience voting is early voting, which is offered in 37 states and the District of Columbia, according to the National Conference of State Legislators. During early voting, citizens can cast ballots in person during a designated time period prior to Election Day. Three states – Washington, Oregon and Colorado – automatically mail ballots to all eligible voters so they can vote by mail. In every state, voters can request absentee ballots, which can be returned by mail or in person. Several states, including California, New Jersey and Arizona, allow voters to join a permanent absentee voting list and, once joined, they will receive absentee ballots automatically for future elections.

How have these changes affected turnout among disabled voters? A 2016 report published in American Politics Research looks at how convenience voting initiatives in particular have impacted turnout. For the study, Peter Miller of the University of Pennsylvania and Sierra Powell of the University of California, Irvine used data collected by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to examine whether and how disabled Americans voted in presidential and midterm elections between 1998 and 2012.

Some of the key findings of the study, titled “Overcoming Voting Obstacles: The Use of Convenience Voting by Voters With Disabilities,” are:

  • Adults with a disability besides a hearing impairment are much more likely to abstain from voting. Having a labor-precluding disability raises the likelihood that someone will not vote by an average of about 78 percent.
  • Americans with only a hearing impairment are nearly as likely to vote as Americans with no disability.
  • Voters with a disability are significantly more likely to use mail ballots compared to voters with no disability and the likelihood has increased over time.
  • There is no clear relationship between disability and early voting in person.
  • Changes aimed at improving the accessibility of polling places for voters with disabilities will have little effect on turnout.

The authors recommend that future researchers explore how political parties and interest groups work with adults with disabilities to take advantage of convenience voting while also trying to maintain ballot secrecy for those using mail ballots. “As other scholars have noted — and we also find — Americans with disabilities are significantly less likely to participate in elections, an essential act of democratic life,” the authors state. “These data show, however, that having a disability does not always lead to disenfranchisement. Instead, there are ways to reform voting systems to make the franchise more accessible for Americans with disabilities.”

Related research: A 2015 article published in the Election Law Journal, “Accessible Democracy: Reducing Voting Obstacles for People with Disabilities,” analyzes voter turnout and voting difficulties among U.S. citizens with disabilities. A 2012 study in Political Research Quarterly, “Making Voting Easier: Convenience Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election,” considers the partisan implications of convenience voting methods.


Keywords: convenience voting, early voting, elections, disability, impaired, polling place, precinct, wheelchair access

    Writer: | Last updated: February 24, 2016

    Citation: Miller, Peter; Powell, Sierra. “Overcoming Voting Obstacles: The Use of Convenience Voting by Voters With Disabilities,” American Politics Research, 2016, Vol. 44. doi: 10.1177/1532673X15586618.

    1 comment

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    Tom Mortenson Mar 1, 2016 17:19

    In states such as Minnesota where unlike elections, which are run by local and state government election officials, precinct caucuses such as that held on Super Tuesday are run by political parties. Everything from site location to conducting preference ballot voting is the responsibility of the party.

    Major political parties must attempt to provide an interpreter by request, if a person is deaf, blind, or hard-of-hearing. If visually impaired, you also have the right to get written caucus materials ahead of time, by request (see 202A.155).


    An individual who is deaf, deafblind, or hard-of-hearing who needs interpreter services at a precinct caucus shall so notify the major political party whose caucus the individual plans to attend. Notice must be given by letter or electronic mail to the state office of the major political party before the precinct caucus date. The major political party shall promptly attempt to secure the services of one or more interpreters if available and shall assume responsibility for the cost of the services if provided. The state central committee of the major political party shall determine the process for reimbursing interpreters.

    A visually impaired individual may notify the county or legislative district committee of the major political party whose precinct caucus the individual plans to attend, that the individual requires caucus materials in audio tape, Braille, or large type format. Upon receiving the request, the county or legislative district committee shall provide all official written caucus materials as soon as they are available, so that the visually impaired individual may have them converted to audio tape, Braille, or large print format prior to the precinct caucus.

    It is my hope that all political parties in locations that hold a caucus adopt similar procedures and promote awareness of these activities to ensure maximum opportunities for all to participate in our electoral process.

    Leave a comment

    Please prove you’re not a robot * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.