:::: MENU ::::

Journalist's Resource

Shorenstein Logo Carnegie and Knight Foundation Logos

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Email Format

Criminal Justice, Security, Military

U.S. Department of Justice: Police use of force, Tasers and other weapons

Tags: , , , | Last updated: July 7, 2011

Last updated: July 7, 2011


Police forces across the United States use a variety of techniques to deal with situations that may involve violence. Though the wooden baton was once the only less-lethal weapon available, more advanced technologies such as Taser devices are now employed. Use of any technique, however, comes with attendant risks, both for the public and for officers, and Tasers remain the subject of significant controversy.

A 2011 report by the U.S. Department of Justice’s National Institute of Justice, “Police Use of Force, Tasers and Other Less-Lethal Weapons,” examines the effectiveness and health outcomes of incidents involving CEDs (conducted energy devices), the most common of which is the Taser. The study looked at a range of police departments and specific incidents, and examined national survey data. The Taser, which is now used by some 15,000 law enforcement and military agencies across the United States, produces 50,000 volts of electricity and temporarily stuns and disables its target. But the electricity produced has also been associated with injury and even death.

The report’s findings include:

  • Injury rates vary widely when officers use force in general, ranging from 17% to 64% for citizens and 10% to 20% for officers.
  • Use of Tasers and other CEDs can reduce the statistical rate of injury to suspects and officers who might otherwise be involved in more direct, physical conflict. An analysis of 12 agencies and more than 24,000 use-of-force cases “showed the odds of suspect injury decreased by almost 60% when a CED was used.” This finding is not uniform across all agencies, however, and comes with a number of caveats.
  • A review of fatal Taser incidents found that many involved multiple uses of the device against the suspect in question. Therefore, “caution is urged in using multiple applications.” Because of increased vulnerability, caution should be exercised in using Tasers against “small children, those with diseased hearts, the elderly, those who are pregnant and other at-risk people.”
  • According to surveys of police departments, rules regarding Taser use vary widely. Six of every ten departments allow “for CED use against a subject who tenses and pulls when the officer tries to handcuff him or her.” In addition, only 31% ban CED use against clearly pregnant women, 25.9% against drivers of moving vehicles, 23.3% against handcuffed suspects, 23.2% against people in elevated areas and 10% against the elderly.
  • CEDs are “rapidly overtaking other force alternatives” among police departments and in some cases are being used at a rate that exceeds that of officers using “soft empty hand tactics,” or simple pushing or grappling with resistant suspects.
  • Overall, the growing use of CEDs is cause for concern: “Although the injury findings suggest that substituting CEDs for physical control tactics may be useful, their ease of use and popularity among officers raise the specter of overuse.”

Tags: crime, guns, safety, technology

Writer: | July 7, 2011

Citation: Stinson, Philip Matthew, Sr,; et al. "Police Use of Force, Tasers and Other Less-Lethal Weapons" International Journal of Police Science & Management, March, 2012, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1-19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2012.14.1.237.

Analysis assignments

Read the report "Police Use of Force, Tasers and Other Less-Lethal Weapons" (PDF).

  1. Summarize the report in fewer than 40 words.
  2. Express the report's key term(s) in language a lay audience can understand.
  3. Evaluate the report's limitations.

Read the issue-related New York Times editorial "Tasers and Liability."

  1. If you were to rewrite the article based on knowledge of the report, what key changes would you make?

Newswriting assignments

  1. Write a lead (or headline or nut graph) based on the report.
  2. Spend 60 minutes exploring the issue by accessing sources of information other than the report. Write a lead (or headline or nut graph) based on the report but informed by the new information. Does the new information significantly change what one would write based on the report alone?
  3. Interview two sources with a stake in or knowledge of the issue. Be prepared to provide them with a short summary of the report in order to get their response to it. Write a 400-word article about the report incorporating material from the interviews.
  4. Spend additional time exploring the issue and then write a 1,200-word background article, focusing on major aspects of the issue.

Leave a comment

− 4 = two