:::: MENU ::::

Climate Change, Energy, Infrastructure, Sustainability, Transportation

Electric vehicles, battery technology and renewable energy: Research roundup

Tags: , , ,

Electric car charging (Wikimedia)Electric car charging (Wikimedia)Electric car charging (Wikimedia)
(Wikimedia)

One of the few constants in technology is change — the only question is how fast it arrives. For centuries the term “drone” strictly referred to male bees, but by the 2000s it was most often heard when discussing remotely controlled — and deadly — military aircraft. Not long after, drones were available as toys, and next year they could be delivering packages in your neighborhood.

In recent decades energy production has shifted with similar speed: Hydraulic fracturing was first invented in the 1940s, but when combined with horizontal drilling in the 2000s it ignited a boom in oil and gas production in the United States. Renewable energy has also grown rapidly as technology has improved: U.S. wind power produced just 70 trillion BTUs of energy in 2001, yet by 2010 had risen to 924 trillion BTUs — more than 13 times higher. By 2014, wind generated more than 181 gigawatt hours of power, up 8% from 2013’s total. Looking forward, the United States expects to get 35% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2050, and research indicates that 80% is feasible with current technology.

Change tends to accelerate at “inflection points,” where a technological advance or shift in policy makes what was a theoretical possibility a practical — and profitable — reality. A 2015 study in Nature Climate Change, “Rapidly Falling Costs of Battery Packs for Electric Vehicles,” evaluates the future prospects for battery electric vehicles (BEV). A key question is cost and capacity of their battery packs, by far their most important component: The more capacity batteries have, the longer electric cars can run; the lower the cost, the better they can compete against gas-powered vehicles in the marketplace. Longer range would also reduce the necessary density of any nationwide charging network, no small matter.

The study’s authors, Bjorn Nykvist and Mans Nilsson of the Stockholm Environment Institute, analyzed more than 80 estimates from 2007 to 2014 to trace advances in the costs and capacity of Li-ion battery packs for electric vehicles. “The literature reveals that costs are coming down, but with large uncertainties on past, current and future costs of the dominating Li-ion technology,” they note.

  • Costs per kilowatt hour (kWh) declined substantially over the study period: “Industry-wide cost estimates declined by approximately 14% annually between 2007 and 2014, from above US$1,000 per kWh to around US$410 per kWh,” a total drop of nearly 60%.
  • Major vehicle manufacturers such as Nissan (Leaf), General Motors (Volt) and Tesla have seen the steepest declines in cost per kilowatt hour: “The cost of battery packs used by market-leading BEV manufacturers are even lower, at US$300 per kWh, and has declined by 8% annually.”
  • The “learning rate,” which is the cost reduction after a cumulative doubling of production, was between 6% and 9%. This indicates that as manufacturing of electric vehicles increases in scale, vehicle-batter costs per kilowatt hour will continue to drop.

Cost of Li-ion battery packs in BEV (nature.com)

  • The scholars estimate that the inflection point for batteries is approximately $150 per kilowatt hour, shown by the rose-colored band in the above graph: “If costs reach as low as US$150 per kWh, this means that electric vehicles will probably move beyond niche applications and begin to penetrate the market widely, leading to a potential paradigm shift in vehicle technology.” Studies show this point potentially being reached as early as 2025.
  • Looking forward, “Renault-Nissan, together with LG, is aiming for a production capacity enabling the production of 1.5 million vehicles by 2016 .. and Tesla Motors, together with Panasonic, have started the construction of a battery plant with a capacity of 0.5 million packs and additional batteries for stationary storage applications (corresponding to 50 GWh per year).”

“The costs of Li-ion battery packs continue to decline and the costs among market leaders are much lower than previously reported,” Nykvist and Nilsson conclude. “This has significant implications for the assumptions used when modeling future energy and transport systems and permits an optimistic outlook for BEVs contributing to low-carbon transport.”

Sustainability, electrical generation and infrastructure

While advances in battery technology could encourage wider adoption of EVs, the corresponding reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions is tied to the fuel used to produce the electricity — and that depends where you plug in. In Texas, it could be wind (10 grams of CO2 per kWh); in Illinois, nuclear (66 grams per kWh over a plant’s entire lifecycle); and in West Virginia, coal (more than a kilogram of CO2 per kWh). Running an EV with electricity from a coal plant thus produces as much C02 as a gas-powered car getting 33 miles per gallon — not a great advance.

Below are a selection of additional studies on technology and renewable energy, relevant to the idea of sustainable electrical generation and transportation:

—————–

“Cost-effectiveness of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Battery Capacity and Charging Infrastructure Investment for Reducing U.S. Gasoline Consumption”
Peterson, Scott B.; Michalek, Jeremy J. Energy Policy, January 2013, Vol. 52, 429-438. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.059.

Findings: Across the battery-capacity and charging-infrastructure scenarios examined, the lowest-cost solution is for more drivers to switch to traditional hybrid electrics or low-capacity plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs): “Charging infrastructure is generally not necessary for operation of PHEVs and substantial gasoline displacement can be achieved solely with home charging.” Installing charging infrastructure would provide lower gasoline savings per dollar spent than paying for increased PHEV battery capacity: “We find that the maximum cost per gallon saved for increased [all-electric range] is 5% to 40% less than the minimum cost per gallon saved when installing charging infrastructure, depending on vehicle class.”

 

“Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles”
Hawkins, Troy R.; et al. Journal of Industrial Ecology, February 2013, Vol. 17, Issue 1, 53–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00532.x.

Summary: “Electric vehicles (EVs) coupled with low-carbon electricity sources offer the potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and exposure to tailpipe emissions from personal transportation. In considering these benefits, it is important to address concerns of problem-shifting…. We find that EVs powered by the present European electricity mix offer a 10% to 24% decrease in global warming potential (GWP) relative to conventional diesel or gasoline vehicles assuming lifetimes of 150,000 km. However, EVs exhibit the potential for significant increases in human toxicity, freshwater eco-toxicity, freshwater eutrophication, and metal depletion impacts, largely emanating from the vehicle supply chain. Results are sensitive to assumptions regarding electricity source, use phase energy consumption, vehicle lifetime, and battery replacement schedules. Because production impacts are more significant for EVs than conventional vehicles, assuming a vehicle lifetime of 200,000 km exaggerates the GWP benefits of EVs to 27% to 29% relative to gasoline vehicles or 17% to 20% relative to diesel. An assumption of 100,000 km decreases the benefit of EVs to 9% to 14% with respect to gasoline vehicles and results in impacts indistinguishable from those of a diesel vehicle. Improving the environmental profile of EVs requires engagement around reducing vehicle production supply chain impacts and promoting clean electricity sources in decision making regarding electricity infrastructure.”

 

“Potential of Lithium-ion Batteries in Renewable Energy”
Dioufa, Boucar; Pode, Ramchandra. Renewable Energy, Volume 76, April 2015, Pages 375–380. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.058

Abstract: “The potential of lithium ion (Li-ion) batteries to be the major energy storage in off-grid renewable energy is presented. Longer lifespan than other technologies along with higher energy and power densities are the most favorable attributes of Li-ion batteries. The Li-ion can be the battery of first choice for energy storage. Nevertheless, Li-ion batteries to be fully adopted in the renewable energy sector need a price reduction that most likely will be due to the mass production. The progress in Li-ion batteries needs to be carried further to match enough energy and power densities for the electric vehicle. We present the electric vehicle sector as the driving force of Li-ion batteries in renewable energies. We believe that the development of the electric vehicle industry could be the driving force for the renewable sector making Li-ion batteries more affordable as a benefit of mass production. In the development of Li-ion technology, the electric automobile will be accompanied by other sectors such as grid storage, consumer electronics, the electric bike, military or other medical applications. We present the incomparable advantages of Li-ion batteries over other technologies even if some challenges are still to overcome for a wider usage in stationary energy storage.”

 

“Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment”
Frankfurt School-UNEP Collaborating Centre for Climate and Sustainable Energy Finance, Bloomberg New Energy Finance, 2015.

Highlights: “The past year brought a rebound of green energy investments worldwide with a surge of a solid 17% to $270 billion. Brushing aside the challenge of sharply lower crude oil prices, this sudden increase reversed the investment dip of the past two years and was mainly driven by investments in solar and wind energy…. Wind, solar, biomass and waste-to-power, geothermal, small hydro and marine power contributed an estimated 9.1% of world electricity generation in 2014, compared to 8.5% in 2013. This would be equivalent to a saving of 1.3 gigatonnes of CO2 taking place as a result of the installed capacity of those renewable sources. As in previous years, the market in 2014 was dominated by record investments in solar and wind, which accounted for 92% of overall investment in renewable power and fuels. Investment in solar jumped 29% to $149.6 billion, the second highest figure ever, while wind investment increased 11% to a record $99.5 billion. These expenditures added 49GW of wind capacity and 46GW of solar PV, both records.”

 

“Renewable Electricity Futures for the United States”
Mai, Trieu; et al. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2014. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2013.2290472.

Abstract: “This paper highlights the key results from the Renewable Electricity (RE) Futures Study. It is a detailed consideration of renewable electricity in the United States. The paper focuses on technical issues related to the operability of the U.S. electricity grid and provides initial answers to important questions about the integration of high penetrations of renewable electricity technologies from a national perspective. The results indicate that the future U.S. electricity system that is largely powered by renewable sources is possible and further work is warranted to investigate this clean-generation pathway. The central conclusion of the analysis is that renewable electricity generation from technologies that are commercially available today, in combination with a more flexible electric system, is more than adequate to supply 80% of the total U.S. electricity generation in 2050 while meeting electricity demand on an hourly basis in every region of the United States.”

 

“Current and Future Cost of Photovoltaics: Long-term Scenarios for Market Development, System Prices and LCOE of Utility-Scale PV Systems”
Fürstenwerth, Daniel (project lead); Kleiner, Mara Marthe (editor); et al. Agora Energiewende, February 2015.

Insights: “Solar photovoltaics is already today a low-cost renewable energy technology: Cost of power from large scale photovoltaic installations in Germany fell from over 40 ct/kWh in 2005 to 9ct/kWh in 2014. Even lower prices have been reported in sunnier regions of the world, since a major share of cost components is traded on global markets. Solar power will soon be the cheapest form of electricity in many regions of the world: Even in conservative scenarios and assuming no major technological breakthroughs, an end to cost reduction is not in sight. Depending on annual sunshine, power cost of 4-6 ct/kWh are expected by 2025, reaching 2-4 ct/kWh by 2050 (conservative estimate). Financial and regulatory environments will be key to reducing cost in the future: Cost of hardware sourced from global markets will decrease irrespective of local conditions. However, inadequate regulatory regimes may increase cost of power by up to 50 percent through higher cost of finance. This may even overcompensate the effect of better local solar resources.Most scenarios fundamentally underestimate the role of solar power in future energy systems: Based on outdated cost estimates, most scenarios modeling future domestic, regional or global power systems foresee only a small contribution of solar power. The results of our analysis indicate that a fundamental review of cost-optimal power system pathways is necessary.”

 

“U.S. Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support”
Platzer, Michaela D. Congressional Research Service, January 2015.

Summary: “The most widely used solar technology involves photovoltaic (PV) solar modules, which draw on semiconducting materials to convert sunlight into electricity. By year-end 2013, the total number of grid-connected PV systems nationwide reached more than 445,000. Domestic demand is met both by imports and by about 75 U.S. manufacturing facilities employing upwards of 30,000 U.S. workers in 2014. Production is clustered in a few states including California, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Washington…. Domestic PV manufacturers operate in a dynamic, volatile, and highly competitive global market now dominated by Chinese and Taiwanese companies. China alone accounted for nearly 70% of total solar module production in 2013. Some PV manufacturers have expanded their operations beyond China to places like Malaysia, the Philippines, and Mexico. Overcapacity has led to a precipitous decline in module prices, which have fallen 65% to 70% since 2009.”

 

Keywords: cars, transportation, pollution, greenhouse gases, global warming, infrastructure, research roundup, renewable energy


    Writer: | Last updated: April 9, 2015

    Citation: Nykvist, Björn; Nilsson, Måns, "Rapidly Falling Costs of Battery Packs for Electric Vehicles," Nature Climate Change, March 2015. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2564.

    Analysis assignments

    Read the issue-related New York Times article titled "Utilities Push Into Fuel Stations for Electric Cars."

    1. What key insights from the news article and the study in this lesson should reporters be aware of as they cover these issues?

    Read the study-related BloombergView article titled "Clean Energy Revolution Is Ahead of Schedule."

    1. Reporter's use of the study: Evaluate what the reporter chose to include and exclude from the study. Would the audience have acquired a clear understanding of the study's findings and limits from this article?
    2. Reporter's use of other material: Assess the material in the article that is not derived from the study. For example: Does the reporter place the study in the context of other research and to what effect? Does the reporter include reactions to the study from other researchers or interested parties (e.g., political groups, business leaders, or community members) and are their credentials or possible biases made clear?

    Read the full study titled "Rapidly Falling Costs of Battery Packs for Electric Vehicles."

    1. What are the study's key technical terms? Which ones need to be put into language a lay audience can understand?
    2. Do the study’s authors put the research into context and show how they are advancing the state of knowledge about the subject? If so, what did the previous research indicate?
    3. What is the study’s research method? If there are statistical results, how did the scholars arrive at them?
    4. Evaluate the study's limitations. (For example, are there weaknesses in the study's data or research design?)
    5. How could the findings be misreported or misinterpreted by a reporter? In other words, what are the difficulties in conveying the data accurately? Give an example of a faulty headline or story lead.

    Newswriting and digital reporting assignments

    1. Write a lead, headline or nut graph based on the study.
    2. Spend 60 minutes exploring the issue by accessing sources of information other than the study. Write a lead (or headline or nut graph) based on the study but informed by the new information. Does the new information significantly change what one would write based on the study alone?
    3. Compose two Twitter messages of 140 characters or fewer accurately conveying the study’s findings to a general audience. Make sure to use appropriate hashtags.
    4. Choose several key quotations from the study and show how they would be set up and used in a brief blog post.
    5. Map out the structure for a 60-second video segment about the study. What combination of study findings and visual aids could be used?
    6. Find pictures and graphics that might run with a story about the study. If appropriate, also find two related videos to embed in an online posting. Be sure to evaluate the credibility and appropriateness of any materials you would aggregate and repurpose.

    Class discussion questions

    1. What is the study’s most important finding?
    2. Would members of the public intuitively understand the study’s findings? If not, what would be the most effective way to relate them?
    3. What kinds of knowledgeable sources you would interview to report the study in context?
    4. How could the study be “localized” and shown to have community implications?
    5. How might the study be explained through the stories of representative individuals? What kinds of people might a reporter feature to make such a story about the study come alive?
    6. What sorts of stories might be generated out of secondary information or ideas discussed in the study?

    1 comment

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    Howard Lee Jul 16, 2015 16:06

    Mr Kille,

    Your article is very informative however I would like to add that the ‘pollution’ rate for centralized electrical sources will be multiples of independant internal combustion sources due to the loss rate of electrical transmission systems, even over short distances. The resistance of cabling and regulation devices is substantial and increases with load at a rate which is exponentially proportional to the current and the temperature of all components within the circuit. By this fact it can be determined that the amount of waste produced (depleted nuclear isotopes, carbon monoxide, consumption of surface area for solar, dam space and disruption of waterways for hydro, in addition to the costs of maintenance and component fabrication) will be exponentially greater than that produced by independant internal combustion engines with local fuel sources therefore it can be concluded that alternative fuels for internal combustion engines will be the more efficient and environmentally friendly solution.

    It seems that most analysts ignore this point when considering the practicality of pure electric transportation and recharging infrastructure.

    Leave a comment


    Please prove you’re not a robot * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.