Heat waves in the United States: Research on trends, definitions and dangers to the public
Tags: July 19, 2013| Last updated:
Last updated: July 19, 2013
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) found that average recent temperatures in the United States were dramatically hotter than that of any previous year recorded: “In 2012, the contiguous United States (CONUS) average annual temperature of 55.3°F was 3.2°F above the 20th century average, and was the warmest year in the 1895-2012 period of record for the nation. The 2012 annual temperature was 1.0°F warmer than the previous record warm year of 1998.” While there will certainly be annual fluctuations, the research consensus is that human-induced climate change will, in effect, “load the dice” and make heat waves more likely — and more extreme. This is already contributing to increased drought and more intense wildfires, scientists have found. The initial 2013 federal National Climate Assessment report notes that “Americans are noticing changes all around them. Summers are longer and hotter, and periods of extreme heat last longer than any living American has ever experienced.”
What might be the human consequences? Research predicts that mortality rates will increase across the population. A 2012 study published in Environmental Research, “Cold and Heat Waves in the United States,” examined data from nearly 100 U.S. cities over a period of more than a decade and concluded that there “was an increased risk of death during heat waves. The largest increases were for the most extreme temperatures … although these extreme heat waves were also the rarest…. However, the public health burden of these extreme heat waves is very likely to increase as global temperature rise and extreme heat waves become more common.” A 2011 study, “Heat Waves in the United States: Mortality Risk during Heat Waves and Effect Modification by Heat Wave Characteristics in 43 U.S. Communities,” published in Environmental Health Perspectives, concludes:
Nationally, mortality increased 3.74% … during heat waves compared with non-heat wave days. Heat wave mortality risk increased 2.49% for every 1°F increase in heat wave intensity and 0.38% for every 1-day increase in heat wave duration. Mortality increased 5.04% … during the first heat wave of the summer versus 2.65% … during later heat waves, compared with non-heat wave days. Heat wave mortality impacts and effect modification by heat wave characteristics were more pronounced in the Northeast and Midwest compared with the South.
The elderly will likely suffer more; indeed, a 2012 research study in the journal Climatic Change estimates that California cities “could have a greater than tenfold increase in short-term increases in heat-related mortality in the over 65 age group by the 2090s.” For those skeptical of these various single-study estimates, it is worth keeping in mind a 2011 metastudy that examined the research findings of 14 previous papers: “Scenario-based projection research will meaningfully contribute to assessing and managing the potential impacts of climate change on heat-related mortality.”
For reporters and policymakers looking for guidance about how to characterize the climate change-weather event connection, it is worth considering the language of a July 2012 report published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society: “In the past it was often stated that it simply was not possible to make an attribution statement about an individual weather or climate event. However, scientific thinking on this issue has moved on and now it is widely accepted that attribution statements about individual weather or climate events are possible, provided proper account is taken of the probabilistic nature of attribution.”
The categories, measurements and language used in this research area can be complex. A 2013 study also published in Climatic Change, “Heat Waves in the United States: Definitions, Patterns and Trends,” analyzes 15 previously published heat wave indices over the period 1979-2011. The researchers, Tiffany T. Smith and Benjamin F. Zaitchik of Johns Hopkins University and Julia M. Gohlke of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, note that there are diverse perspectives on what precisely constitutes a heat wave, and scientists, public health researchers and different regions and communities may have different notions. The study sets out to reconcile this conflicting data. Prior scholarship has produced mixed results when looking, for example, at whether or not heat waves are increasing in the U.S. Southeast region.
The study’s findings include:
- The majority of the data examined “show that the percent area experiencing significant increases in heat waves is larger in the Southeast than in the Northeast, and that for nine of these ten indices the magnitude of trend has been greater in the Southeast than the Northeast. Therefore, according to the majority of indices considered in this study the Southeast has seen larger and more spatially extensive trends than the Northeast.”
- Further, the “Southeast saw the highest values of average heat wave days, indicating that the Southeast has experienced more heat wave days from 1979 to 2011 than any other” region in the Continental United States.
- “From the trend analysis, this study has shown that the Southeast and Great Plains regions have experienced both the largest magnitude and most widespread increases in heat wave days per year according to most indices.”
“Understanding the role that definitions play in such studies,” the researchers conclude, “is important for interpreting seemingly contradictory results and for enhancing the quality of communication between climate scientists, health researchers, and the general public.”
Related research: Also see “Will Future Climate Favor More Erratic Wildfires in the Western United States?” published in the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology.
Keywords: elderly, climate politics, global warming, disasters, research roundup, wildfires, California
Read the issue-related New York Times article titled "Dvorak Is One Casualty of the City's Heat Wave."
- How might reporters best cover weather stories that incorporate both human interest and more technical information on long-term trends? How can a successful reporter do both? What narrative techniques might be employed?
Read the full study titled “Heat Waves in the United States: Definitions, Patterns and Trends.”
- What are the study's key technical terms? Which ones need to be put into language a lay audience can understand?
- Do the study’s authors put the research into context and show how they are advancing the state of knowledge about the subject? If so, what did the previous research indicate?
- What is the study’s research method? If there are statistical results, how did the scholars arrive at them?
- Evaluate the study's limitations. (For example, are there weaknesses in the study's data or research design?)
- How could the findings be misreported or misinterpreted by a reporter? In other words, what are the difficulties in conveying the data accurately? Give an example of a faulty headline or story lead.
Newswriting and digital reporting assignments
- Write a lead, headline or nut graph based on the study.
- Spend 60 minutes exploring the issue by accessing sources of information other than the study. Write a lead (or headline or nut graph) based on the study but informed by the new information. Does the new information significantly change what one would write based on the study alone?
- Compose two Twitter messages of 140 characters or fewer accurately conveying the study’s findings to a general audience. Make sure to use appropriate hashtags.
- Choose several key quotations from the study and show how they would be set up and used in a brief blog post.
- Map out the structure for a 60-second video segment about the study. What combination of study findings and visual aids could be used?
- Find pictures and graphics that might run with a story about the study. If appropriate, also find two related videos to embed in an online posting. Be sure to evaluate the credibility and appropriateness of any materials you would aggregate and repurpose.
Class discussion questions
- What is the study’s most important finding?
- Would members of the public intuitively understand the study’s findings? If not, what would be the most effective way to relate them?
- What kinds of knowledgeable sources you would interview to report the study in context?
- How could the study be “localized” and shown to have community implications?
- How might the study be explained through the stories of representative individuals? What kinds of people might a reporter feature to make such a story about the study come alive?
- What sorts of stories might be generated out of secondary information or ideas discussed in the study?