Are recent college graduates finding good jobs?
In the lingering aftermath of the Great Recession, recent college graduates are having a tough time of it. As state aid for education has fallen, student loans have risen, leading to crippling levels of debt — the average in recent years has been about $23,300, though that figure may have climbed to more than $29,000. Limited options after graduation in a tight job market only make this situation more difficult.
A 2012 Johns Hopkins survey of 450 recent graduates found that only 50% were employed full time, while 26% were working part time, 6% were unemployed and 6% underemployed. A full 60% of those who were working received an hourly wage, averaging just $10.23 per hour. Although the unemployment rate for those with a bachelor’s degree or higher declined in 2013, many recent college graduates are still struggling to find their desired jobs.
A 2014 study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, “Are Recent College Graduates Finding Good Jobs?” puts the struggles of recent college graduates in historical context. Authors Jaison R. Abel, Richard Deitz, and Yaqin Su — all economists with the Regional Analysis Function of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group — use data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Information Network to compare the employment status of new college graduates with those over two decades.
Key findings include:
- The unemployment rates for recent college graduates — defined as those with a bachelor’s degree and between 22 and 27 years old — has been “quite high” since the onset of the Great Recession, peaking at around 7% in 2010. (Note: This figure reflects graduates working in any job — no matter how low-paying.)
- Over the past two decades, recent college graduates have had a harder time finding jobs than college graduates overall: From 1990 through the first quarter of 2013, the average unemployment rate was 4.3% for recent college graduates, but only 2.9 % for all college graduates.
- Unemployment rates varied by major, ranging from 3% to 8%. The majors with the lowest unemployment rates were health (3%) and education (approximately 4%); the highest were for architecture and construction (8%) and liberal arts and social sciences (7% to 8%). (A 2013 report from the Georgetown Public Policy Institute goes deeper into this issue.)
- The underemployment rate of recent college graduates — defined as their working in a job that typically does not require a bachelor’s degree — increased from 34% in 2001 to approximately 44% in 2012.
- For recent college graduates who are underemployed, the quality of their jobs has been declining since 2000. In the 1990s, about 50% of underemployed recent college graduates were in “good non-college jobs,” but this fell to 36% by 2009. (The authors define good non-college jobs as occupations such as electrician, dental hygienist or mechanic that do not require a bachelor’s degree but tend to be career oriented and well compensated.)
- Recent college graduates in low-wage jobs rose from about 15% in 1990 to more than 20% in 2009. In addition, the share of those working part-time rose from around 15% in 2000 to 23% by 2011, with sharp increases after the last two recessions.
“Our analysis demonstrates that new college graduates typically take some time to transition into the labor market and find jobs that utilize their education,” the researchers state. “In fact, during both good and bad economic times, relatively high rates of unemployment and underemployment are not uncommon among college graduates just beginning their careers, and those rates can be expected to drop considerably by the time the graduates reach their late 20s.” They note that their findings should not be considered a deterrent against pursuing higher education.
Related research: A 2013 study from the Pew Center on the States, “How Much Protection Does a College Degree Afford?” examines whether having a degree can give workers more protection against being laid off as well as greater opportunities to move ahead. Among other findings, it determined that while the recession negatively affected most 21- to 24-year-olds, the drop in employment and wages was much more severe for those with less education: Before the downturn, 55% of young adults with a high school degree were employed, compared to 64% with an associate degree and 69% with a bachelor’s degree. After the recession, the employment dropped to 39% for those with HS degrees (down 16%), to 53% for associate degrees (down 11%) and to 62% for bachelors degrees (down only 7%).
Keywords: higher education, youth, financial crisis
Read the study-related Cleveland Plain Dealer article titled "College Graduates Increasingly Working in Low-wage or Part-time Jobs, Study Shows."
- Reporter's use of the study: Evaluate what the reporter chose to include and exclude from the study. Would the audience have acquired a clear understanding of the study's findings and limits from this article?
- Reporter's use of other material: Assess the material in the article that is not derived from the study. For example: Does the reporter place the study in the context of other research and to what effect? Does the reporter include reactions to the study from other researchers or interested parties (e.g., political groups, business leaders, or community members) and are their credentials or possible biases made clear?
Read the full study titled "Are Recent College Graduates Finding Good Jobs?"
- What are the study's key technical terms? Which ones need to be put into language a lay audience can understand?
- Do the study’s authors put the research into context and show how they are advancing the state of knowledge about the subject? If so, what did the previous research indicate?
- What is the study’s research method? If there are statistical results, how did the scholars arrive at them?
- Evaluate the study's limitations. (For example, are there weaknesses in the study's data or research design?)
- How could the findings be misreported or misinterpreted by a reporter? In other words, what are the difficulties in conveying the data accurately? Give an example of a faulty headline or story lead.
Newswriting and digital reporting assignments
- Write a lead, headline or nut graph based on the study.
- Spend 60 minutes exploring the issue by accessing sources of information other than the study. Write a lead (or headline or nut graph) based on the study but informed by the new information. Does the new information significantly change what one would write based on the study alone?
- Compose two Twitter messages of 140 characters or fewer accurately conveying the study’s findings to a general audience. Make sure to use appropriate hashtags.
- Choose several key quotations from the study and show how they would be set up and used in a brief blog post.
- Map out the structure for a 60-second video segment about the study. What combination of study findings and visual aids could be used?
- Find pictures and graphics that might run with a story about the study. If appropriate, also find two related videos to embed in an online posting. Be sure to evaluate the credibility and appropriateness of any materials you would aggregate and repurpose.
Class discussion questions
- What is the study’s most important finding?
- Would members of the public intuitively understand the study’s findings? If not, what would be the most effective way to relate them?
- What kinds of knowledgeable sources you would interview to report the study in context?
- How could the study be “localized” and shown to have community implications?
- How might the study be explained through the stories of representative individuals? What kinds of people might a reporter feature to make such a story about the study come alive?
- What sorts of stories might be generated out of secondary information or ideas discussed in the study?