:::: MENU ::::

Culture, Internet, News Media, Social Media

What audiences think of journalists’ social media use

Tags: , , ,

As more people have turned to Facebook and other social-media platforms as a place to gather and share ideas, many journalists have been urged by newsroom management to use these spaces as a place to share their work and connect with the public. Many journalists are encouraged to engage with audiences by leading Twitter chats, responding to comments left on news articles posted to Facebook and using social media more broadly to develop relationships and drive people to news websites. As social media becomes an increasingly important news source for the American public, reporters feel more pressure to participate in these sorts of interactions. In the U.S., 63% of Facebook users said they get news there – up from 47% in 2013, according to the Pew Research Center. For Twitter users, 63% see that platform as a source of news, an increase of 11 percentage points over two years.

Industry leaders have expressed mixed feelings about newsroom staff using social media to engage with readers and sources, partly because of the risk that they will disclose too much personal information or give opinions. Some reporters, editors and other news employees already have gotten into trouble over comments they made on social media. A New York Times reporter, for example, “got a lashing” from an editor after she tweeted about her frustration with a company she was covering in 2010. A TV meteorologist said she was fired in 2012 after responding to a remark that a viewer left on the TV station’s Facebook page.

Part of the debate about how journalists should use social media centers on audience members – namely, how the trend impacts their view of journalists and their work. Jayeon “Janey” Lee, an assistant professor in Lehigh University’s Department of Journalism and Communication, decided to investigate how these interactions affect audience perceptions. For Lee’s 2015 study, titled “The Double-Edged Sword: The Effects of Journalists’ Social Media Activities on Audience Perceptions of Journalists and Their News Products,” she asked 267 students from a large university in the Midwest to view the Facebook profile of a fictional journalist and offer their opinions about him. Each student saw one of four versions of the reporter’s Facebook page, which featured links to news articles. The Facebook pages differed in the amount of interaction the reporter had with people who had left comments on the news posts. The four pages also differed in how much personal information and personal opinions the reporter shared on his page. After study participants answered questions about the reporter, they were asked to read a news article supposedly written by him and share their opinions about the article.

Among the key findings:

  • The journalist was evaluated more positively when he disclosed personal information and when he had engaged with people who left comments. He was perceived to be more likeable.
  • On a professional level, the journalist’s interaction with commenters had a “significant” negative effect. Study participants viewed him as being less professional.
  • Professionalism ratings were not influenced much by the reporter’s disclosure of information about his personal thoughts and experiences.
  • The journalist’s actions on Facebook impacted how study participants responded to his work. When the mock journalist was viewed positively or negatively, his work was evaluated similarly.

Lee warns that while many journalists and news agencies expect that using social media will help promote journalistic work, the possible consequences are often underestimated. Using social media to interact with audiences can hurt journalists’ professional image even if they are not behaving in a way that could be interpreted as “trash talking” or having a conflict of interest, according to the study. “News organizations should be aware that journalists’ social media activity can affect not only the professional reputation of the journalists but also that of their news products,” the author states. Lee predicts that older audience members’ reactions to social media usage might be more negative than that of college students, who may have more of an appreciation for social media and were likely to be more accustomed to social media norms than traditional journalism norms.


Keywords: social media, social networking, journalist, digital first, disclosure, networking, sourcing, brand building, credibility, interactivity, bias, objectivity, computer-mediated interaction, ethics

    Writer: | Last updated: October 3, 2015

    Citation: Lee, Jayeon. “The Double-Edged Sword: The Effects of Journalists’ Social Media Activities on Audience Perceptions of Journalists and Their News Products,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, May 2015, Vol. 20. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12113.

    We welcome feedback. Please contact us here.

    Analysis assignments

    Read the issue-related Washington Post article titled "Three Charts that Explain How U.S. Journalists Use Social Media."

    1. What key insights from the news article and the study in this lesson should reporters be aware of as they cover these issues?

    Read the full study titled "The Double-Edged Sword: The Effects of Journalists’ Social Media Activities on Audience Perceptions of Journalists and Their News Products."

    1. What are the study's key technical terms? Which ones need to be put into language a lay audience can understand?
    2. Do the study’s authors put the research into context and show how they are advancing the state of knowledge about the subject? If so, what did the previous research indicate?
    3. What is the study’s research method? If there are statistical results, how did the scholars arrive at them?
    4. Evaluate the study's limitations. (For example, are there weaknesses in the study's data or research design?)
    5. How could the findings be misreported or misinterpreted by a reporter? In other words, what are the difficulties in conveying the data accurately? Give an example of a faulty headline or story lead.

    Newswriting and digital reporting assignments

    1. Write a lead, headline or nut graph based on the study.
    2. Spend 60 minutes exploring the issue by accessing sources of information other than the study. Write a lead (or headline or nut graph) based on the study but informed by the new information. Does the new information significantly change what one would write based on the study alone?
    3. Compose two Twitter messages of 140 characters or fewer accurately conveying the study’s findings to a general audience. Make sure to use appropriate hashtags.
    4. Choose several key quotations from the study and show how they would be set up and used in a brief blog post.
    5. Map out the structure for a 60-second video segment about the study. What combination of study findings and visual aids could be used?
    6. Find pictures and graphics that might run with a story about the study. If appropriate, also find two related videos to embed in an online posting. Be sure to evaluate the credibility and appropriateness of any materials you would aggregate and repurpose.

    Class discussion questions

    1. What is the study’s most important finding?
    2. Would members of the public intuitively understand the study’s findings? If not, what would be the most effective way to relate them?
    3. What kinds of knowledgeable sources you would interview to report the study in context?
    4. How could the study be “localized” and shown to have community implications?
    5. How might the study be explained through the stories of representative individuals? What kinds of people might a reporter feature to make such a story about the study come alive?
    6. What sorts of stories might be generated out of secondary information or ideas discussed in the study?