How is the Internet fueling economic growth in the developing world? New research
Over the last decade, the number of people connected to the Internet worldwide has grown rapidly, rising from 910 million in 2004 to nearly 3 billion in 2014. Penetration is highest in the developed world — 88% in North America and 81% in Western Europe, while in Asian countries such as South Korea and Japan, more than 90% of the population have access. Internet use is also climbing in the developing world, often through the use of smart phones.
The Internet has powered the growth of firms in tech hubs such as Silicon Valley and has the potential to change the way a broad range of businesses operate. It has already shaken up the news media and has even invented an entirely new sector — the sharing economy. In the developing world, some farmers already use Internet-equipped smartphones to monitor market prices, and mobile systems such as Kenya’s M-PESA have provided millions of people with access to financial services. Such “mobile leapfrogging” can help bridge the digital divide.
To investigate the potential impact of the Web on business performance in the developing world, a 2015 study, “Overcoming Obstacles: The Internet’s Contribution to Firm Development,” analyzed data from firms in 117 nations over a five-year period, 2006 to 2011. Authored by Caroline Paunov of the OECD and Valentina Rollo of Switzerland’s Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, the report looks at whether constraints in developing economies limit potential positive impacts of the Internet on firm performance.
The scholars based their work on data from more than 46,000 firms surveyed by the World Bank. The largest proportion, 40%, came from Latin America and the Caribbean, with 27% from Africa, 22% from Eastern Europe, Central Asia or the Middle East, and 11% from the East Asian Pacific or South Asia. As a measure of Internet access, the study looked at firms’ use of email to communicate with suppliers and customers.
The study’s findings include:
- Internet uptake was relatively high among the firms studied. Even in low-income economies, 45.2% of companies used the Internet. While small firms were less active than large firms, their rate was still 44.5%.
- Overall, Internet adoption had a positive impact on productivity in a broad range of regions and at firms at different development stages. The exception was in the East Asia Pacific and South Asia, where there were no measurable positive impacts on productivity.
- Internet adoption remained beneficial even where firms face problems with corruption or a shortage of skilled labor. Benefits were reduced where labor regulations were more burdensome; where financial markets were under-developed; and where electricity outages were more frequent. Despite this, even firms facing such limitations saw productivity increase after Internet adoption in their sector.
- Firms that were more productive initially benefitted more from Internet adoption, perhaps because these firms had higher “absorptive capabilities” from the outset. The benefits were as much as three times higher than those seen by less-productive firms.
The authors conclude that their findings leave reason for optimism about the potential for the Internet to boost productivity in developing economies: “We show that the Internet had positive impacts on firm’s productivity across world regions and across different stages of development. Even firms facing financial constraints, frequent power outages, skills shortages, corruption, and cumbersome labor regulations gained.”
Related research: A 2013 paper from Jonathan Obar at Michigan State and the University of Toronto and Philip Napoli at Fordham University, “Mobile Leapfrogging and Digital Divide Policy,” highlights the developing world’s patterns of Internet access and examines the tradeoffs between mobile and PC-based platforms.
Keywords: Internet, industry, business, productivity, development, techology
We welcome feedback. Please contact us here.
Read the issue-related New York Times article titled "The World’s Coming Broadband Divide."
- What key insights from the news article and the study in this lesson should reporters be aware of as they cover these issues?
Read the full study titled "Overcoming Obstacles: The Internet’s Contribution to Firm Development."
- What are the study's key technical terms? Which ones need to be put into language a lay audience can understand?
- Do the study’s authors put the research into context and show how they are advancing the state of knowledge about the subject? If so, what did the previous research indicate?
- What is the study’s research method? If there are statistical results, how did the scholars arrive at them?
- Evaluate the study's limitations. (For example, are there weaknesses in the study's data or research design?)
- How could the findings be misreported or misinterpreted by a reporter? In other words, what are the difficulties in conveying the data accurately? Give an example of a faulty headline or story lead.
Newswriting and digital reporting assignments
- Write a lead, headline or nut graph based on the study.
- Spend 60 minutes exploring the issue by accessing sources of information other than the study. Write a lead (or headline or nut graph) based on the study but informed by the new information. Does the new information significantly change what one would write based on the study alone?
- Compose two Twitter messages of 140 characters or fewer accurately conveying the study’s findings to a general audience. Make sure to use appropriate hashtags.
- Choose several key quotations from the study and show how they would be set up and used in a brief blog post.
- Map out the structure for a 60-second video segment about the study. What combination of study findings and visual aids could be used?
- Find pictures and graphics that might run with a story about the study. If appropriate, also find two related videos to embed in an online posting. Be sure to evaluate the credibility and appropriateness of any materials you would aggregate and repurpose.
Class discussion questions
- What is the study’s most important finding?
- Would members of the public intuitively understand the study’s findings? If not, what would be the most effective way to relate them?
- What kinds of knowledgeable sources you would interview to report the study in context?
- How could the study be “localized” and shown to have community implications?
- How might the study be explained through the stories of representative individuals? What kinds of people might a reporter feature to make such a story about the study come alive?
- What sorts of stories might be generated out of secondary information or ideas discussed in the study?