Federal student loan debt burden of noncompleters: Statistics in brief
Student loan debt has become an increasing problem in recent years. As the New York Federal Reserve notes in a 2013 report, “Over the last eight years, aggregate educational debt outstanding has almost tripled, rising to nearly $1 trillion and becoming the largest consumer liability after mortgages.”
No other form of debt — auto loans, home equity, credit cards — has seen this sort of steady rise for Americans. Between 2004 and 2012, the number of borrowers and the average amount borrowed each went up by 70%. Still, the overall debt for individual students varies significantly; most students end up with a burden of less than $25,000, and nearly 40% have less than $10,000, as the New York Fed highlights:
A college degree, particularly one in a science and technology discipline, can lead to increased earnings over the course of a lifetime. While the cost of higher education has soared since 1980, aspiring students of limited means can receive financial aid — typically some combination of federal grants, low-interest loans, and institutional work-study and awards — to pay for their education. For instance, the Stafford Loan program disbursed approximately $24 billion over the 1999-2000 academic year, $31 billion in the 2003-2004 year, $36 billion in 2007-2008 and $56 billion in 2009-2010.
It is not clear to what degree these loans help students complete their education. A 2013 study from the College Board Advocacy and Policy Center found that only 25% of Pell Grant recipients 25 or younger completed their bachelor’s degrees six years later, and the rate was just 3% for older students. To what extent do finances play a role in college completion rates?
A 2013 report from MPR Associates for the National Center for Education Statistics, “Federal Student Loan Debt Burden of Noncompleters: Statistics in Brief,” examines federal student debt burden accrued by students who did not complete a postsecondary credential within six years. The researchers analayzed longitudinal National Center for Education Statistics data of postsecondary students who first enrolled in 1995-1996 (and their status as of 2001) or 2003-2004 ( and status as of 2009) to better understand completion rates, borrowing habits and debt burdens. (Note: These figures only reflect federal loans and do not reflect total debt for students, as many loans also come from private sources.)
Study highlights include:
- As of 2009, the percentage of noncompleters after six years ranged from 19% of students in private nonprofit four-year institutions to 46% in public two-year colleges or for-profit institutions. An increase in noncompletion between 2001 and 2009 was observed only for students in for-profit institutions (from 35% to 46%).
- Noncompleters’ use of federal loan programs ranged from 25% of those attending public two-year colleges to 86% for those at for-profit institutions; comparable rates for students in four-year public and private nonprofit institutions were 54% and 66%, respectively.
- For those who started at for-profit colleges, the average federal loan debt was $7500 in 2009 dollars. That figure was $9300 among students who enrolled at four-year public colleges; and $10,400 for students who began private four-year colleges.
- The cumulative amount borrowed per academic credit earned was highest for noncompleters at for-profit institutions — $350 per credit, compared with $80-$190 per credit in the other three types of institutions.
- The median cumulative federal student debt for all noncompleters was the equivalent of 35% of their annual income. The debt burden was highest for students in four-year private nonprofit institutions — 51% of borrowers’ annual income. Debt burden among noncompleters who started in for-profit institutions increased from 20% to 43% of annual income between 2001 and 2009.
- In 2009, 31% of noncompleters who started at for-profit institutions carried debt of 100% or more of their annual incomes. This far exceeds the rates of those with similar debt burdens who first started at other types of institutions, 7% to 21%.
- “Noncompleters in 2009 had lower rates of employment when they left post-secondary education than did completers at all four institution sectors analyzed in the study.” The lower rates of employment affect the ability of nocompleters to pay back loans that have grown increasingly burdensome.
“While student loans improve access to postsecondary education, repaying them has become increasingly difficult for students who are unemployed, underemployed or who earn a limited income,” the researchers write. Unfortunately, “these circumstances are more common among students who do not complete a degree than among those who do.”
Tags: employment, inequality, student loans, higher education
We welcome feedback. Please contact us here.
Read the issue-related Montana Kaimin article titled "National Budget Bill May Increase Options For Debt-Burdened Students."
- What key insights from the news article and the study in this lesson should reporters be aware of as they cover these issues?
Read the full study titled “Federal Student Loan Debt Burden of Noncompleters: A Statistics in Brief.”
- What are the study's key technical terms? Which ones need to be put into language a lay audience can understand?
- Do the study’s authors put the research into context and show how they are advancing the state of knowledge about the subject? If so, what did the previous research indicate?
- What is the study’s research method? If there are statistical results, how did the scholars arrive at them?
- Evaluate the study's limitations. (For example, are there weaknesses in the study's data or research design?)
- How could the findings be misreported or misinterpreted by a reporter? In other words, what are the difficulties in conveying the data accurately? Give an example of a faulty headline or story lead.
Newswriting and digital reporting assignments
- Write a lead, headline or nut graph based on the study.
- Spend 60 minutes exploring the issue by accessing sources of information other than the study. Write a lead (or headline or nut graph) based on the study but informed by the new information. Does the new information significantly change what one would write based on the study alone?
- Compose two Twitter messages of 140 characters or fewer accurately conveying the study’s findings to a general audience. Make sure to use appropriate hashtags.
- Choose several key quotations from the study and show how they would be set up and used in a brief blog post.
- Map out the structure for a 60-second video segment about the study. What combination of study findings and visual aids could be used?
- Find pictures and graphics that might run with a story about the study. If appropriate, also find two related videos to embed in an online posting. Be sure to evaluate the credibility and appropriateness of any materials you would aggregate and repurpose.
Class discussion questions
- What is the study’s most important finding?
- Would members of the public intuitively understand the study’s findings? If not, what would be the most effective way to relate them?
- What kinds of knowledgeable sources you would interview to report the study in context?
- How could the study be “localized” and shown to have community implications?
- How might the study be explained through the stories of representative individuals? What kinds of people might a reporter feature to make such a story about the study come alive?
- What sorts of stories might be generated out of secondary information or ideas discussed in the study?