:::: MENU ::::

Cities, Climate Change, Infrastructure

Urban adaptation can roll back warming of emerging megapolitan regions

Tags: ,

As the world’s population grows, so do cities. By 2030 more than 60% of all people on Earth — 5 billion out of the 8 billion — will live in urbanized areas. While some of the growth will be accommodated through increased density, nearly 6 million square kilometers of land could be urbanized, much of it with low-density sprawl that spreads outward from established city centers.

When development is compact and walkable, urbanization can have a restraining effect on climate change — on average, denser cities have significantly lower per-capita C02 emissions than suburban and rural areas. However, urbanized environments are subject to what is known as the “heat island effect”: Dark-colored buildings and especially pavement — omnipresent in automobile-dominated suburbs — absorb heat from the sun during the day and release it at night. A 2013 study found that asphalt can be 20 to 30 degrees Celsius hotter than ambient air temperatures during the day.

Research has explored the potential of reducing the heat-island effect through simple changes in the built environment. A 2009 study by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, “Global Cooling: Increasing World-Wide Urban Albedos to Offset CO2,” demonstrated that increasing the reflectivity of pavement and roofs can be highly effective: Every 100 square feet of dark roof area that is painted white can offset the emission of one ton of atmospheric CO2. Consequently, the 20 tons of CO2 that the average American generates annually could be offset by 2,000 square feet of white roof.

Many cities are beginning to plan in these ways. MIT’s Department of Urban Studies and Planning issued an overview: “Progress and Challenges in Urban Climate Adaptation Planning: A Global Survey.” That 2012 report, which examined data from 468 cities worldwide, finds:

Sixty-eight percent of cities worldwide report that they are pursuing adaptation planning, with Latin American and Canadian cities having the highest rates of engagement (95% and 92% respectively) and the U.S. having the lowest (59%). Cities are engaged in different activities associated with adaptation planning. At the extremes, 37% report being in the preparatory stages, while 18% are working on implementation, although many in this latter group may be linking implementation to ongoing work activities, such as land use and coastal zone planning, rather than pursuing dedicated adaptation activities.

A 2014 study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), Urban Adaptation Can Roll Back Warming of Emerging Megapolitan Regions,” looks at the potential of large-scale urban adaptation strategies to counteract the effects of long-term global climate change. The researchers — Matei Georgescu of Arizona State University and Philip E. Morefield, Britta G. Bierwagen, and Christopher P. Weaver of the Environmental Protection Agency — note that approximately 25% of the expected increase in urbanized areas will occur in China and India, and Africa is projected to have a 600% increase: “Urban expansion within these areas will almost certainly be highly concentrated, potentially exposing highly vulnerable populations to land-use-driven climate change.”

In the study, the researchers modeled a range of possible scenarios for population growth, urban expansion and climate change within the contiguous United States by the year 2100. The minimum projected population for that year (referred to as scenario B1) was 380 million inhabitants — a figure expected to be surpassed by 2050 — and the maximum scenario (called A2) corresponded to 690 million. Compared to the year 2000, by 2100 an additional 208,000 to 261,000 square kilometers of U.S. land could be urbanized. Strategies to reduce the induced warming included both green and cool roofs as well as hybrid approaches.

The study’s findings include:

  • Without any adaptive urban design, by 2100 the expansion of existing U.S. cities into regional megalopolises could raise near-surface temperatures between 1 and 2 degrees Celsius over large regions.
  • In the scenario assuming the greatest increase in population, urbanization and greenhouse-gas emissions, urban areas will significantly contribute to regional warming. Their projected contribution to regional warming include 15% in Chicago/Detroit and 27% in California, and could reach 50% in some areas. “This warming is a significant fraction of the 21st century greenhouse gas-induced climate change simulated by global climate models.”
  • Careful planning and urban design as well as retrofitting of existing buildings can offset a significant percentage of regional warming over large scales, and even reverse it. For example, in California the maximum scenario (A2) would increase temperatures by 1.31 degrees Celsius. At the same time, 100% deployment of cool roofs would result in a temperature drop of 1.47 degrees Celsius — more than the increase.
  • While cool roofs reduce energy demand during hot weather, they can increase it during the winter when buildings must be heated more. However, the energy gain from reduced air-conditioning use in summer more than makes up for the need for increased winter heating: “For every 1 degree Celsius of environmental warming, cooling energy demand increases by 5% to 20%. For every 1 degree Celsius of environmental cooling, demand for heating energy increases by 3 to 15%.”
  • There is no one-size-fits-all solution, as different regions have different needs. Solutions have to be tailored to regions’ specific geographic and climate demands.

“Our results quantify how judicious choices in urban planning and design cannot only counteract the climatological impacts of the urban expansion itself but also, can, in fact, even offset a significant percentage of future greenhouse warming over large scales,” the researchers conclude. “Additional approaches requiring investigation include incorporation of permeable surfaces, which can reduce peak storm water runoff” and seasonally adjustable cool roofs, which would allow energy savings in both hot and cool weather.

Keywords: greenhouse gases, global warming, climate change, @leightonwalter, @journoresource

    Writer: | Last updated: February 13, 2014

    Citation: Georgescu, Matei; Morefield, Philip E.; Bierwagen, Britta G.; Weaver, Christopher P. “Urban Adaptation Can Roll Back Warming of Emerging Megapolitan Regions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), January 2014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322280111.

    We welcome feedback. Please contact us here.

    Analysis assignments

    Read the study-related Christian Science Monitor article titled "Cool Roofs in Warming Cities? They May come at a Cost, Study Finds."

    1. Reporter's use of the study: Evaluate what the reporter chose to include and exclude from the study. Would the audience have acquired a clear understanding of the study's findings and limits from this article?
    2. Reporter's use of other material: Assess the material in the article that is not derived from the study. For example: Does the reporter place the study in the context of other research and to what effect? Does the reporter include reactions to the study from other researchers or interested parties (e.g., political groups, business leaders, or community members) and are their credentials or possible biases made clear?

    Read the full study titled Urban Adaptation Can Roll Back Warming of Emerging Megapolitan Regions.”

    1. What are the study's key technical terms? Which ones need to be put into language a lay audience can understand?
    2. Do the study’s authors put the research into context and show how they are advancing the state of knowledge about the subject? If so, what did the previous research indicate?
    3. What is the study’s research method? If there are statistical results, how did the scholars arrive at them?
    4. Evaluate the study's limitations. (For example, are there weaknesses in the study's data or research design?)
    5. How could the findings be misreported or misinterpreted by a reporter? In other words, what are the difficulties in conveying the data accurately? Give an example of a faulty headline or story lead.

    Newswriting and digital reporting assignments

    1. Write a lead, headline or nut graph based on the study.
    2. Spend 60 minutes exploring the issue by accessing sources of information other than the study. Write a lead (or headline or nut graph) based on the study but informed by the new information. Does the new information significantly change what one would write based on the study alone?
    3. Compose two Twitter messages of 140 characters or fewer accurately conveying the study’s findings to a general audience. Make sure to use appropriate hashtags.
    4. Choose several key quotations from the study and show how they would be set up and used in a brief blog post.
    5. Map out the structure for a 60-second video segment about the study. What combination of study findings and visual aids could be used?
    6. Find pictures and graphics that might run with a story about the study. If appropriate, also find two related videos to embed in an online posting. Be sure to evaluate the credibility and appropriateness of any materials you would aggregate and repurpose.

    Class discussion questions

    1. What is the study’s most important finding?
    2. Would members of the public intuitively understand the study’s findings? If not, what would be the most effective way to relate them?
    3. What kinds of knowledgeable sources you would interview to report the study in context?
    4. How could the study be “localized” and shown to have community implications?
    5. How might the study be explained through the stories of representative individuals? What kinds of people might a reporter feature to make such a story about the study come alive?
    6. What sorts of stories might be generated out of secondary information or ideas discussed in the study?