Connection between social welfare participation, gender and obesity
The United States has one of the highest obesity rates in the world, and the primary causes — unhealthy diets and a lack of exercise — are well known. However, the social, economic, psychological and policy factors underlying the problem are less clear.
A 2010 study from Duke University, “Getting Fat on Government Cheese: The Connection Between Social Welfare Participation, Gender and Obesity in America” (PDF), analyzed data from the Centers for Disease Control and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to assess the health outcomes of women participating in the government Food Stamps and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) programs.
The study’s findings include:
- Women of all socio-economic statuses, ages, and races, have a consistently higher rate of obesity compared to men (a 4-6% difference over the last 10 years.) In the lowest income quartile, nearly 16% more women are obese than men.
- On average, food stamps are provided annually to 4.5 million more women than men.
- The average food stamp benefit received by individuals is the equivalent of $21 per person per week, which means there is a food budget of $3 per day to buy well-rounded, healthy food. The ability to receive benefits is unstable for many and depends on demonstrated financial need; benefits are issued on a monthly basis — a long interval that may leave gaps in available funds for families.
- Because welfare benefits are no longer guaranteed for any extended period, many women in poverty live in a perpetual state of “food insecurity.” This “promotes obesity by encouraging overconsumption in anticipation of future caloric shortfalls.”
- Many of the participants in the food stamps program live in “food deserts”: urban or rural communities where retail stores have extremely limited options in terms of healthy food. Some 25% of food stamps participants do not have easy access to a supermarket.
- Under welfare-to-work reforms enacted in 1996, an adult recipient must have 30 hours a week of “work activity” to receive these benefits. Because many women are single with children and thus have limited time, this work obligation may limit their ability to travel to find nutritional foods, prepare healthy meals for themselves and their families, and exercise.
The study concludes that government welfare programs should be reassessed “to eliminate the obesity-inducing food insecurity, temporal poverty, and unhealthy food selection” that they currently promote.
Tags: children, consumer affairs, gender, nutrition, poverty, inequality, rural
We welcome feedback. Please contact us here.
Read the issue-related USA Today article "Southerners, Poor Have Highest Rates of Obesity."
- If you were to rewrite the article based on knowledge of the study, what key changes would you make?
Read the Duke University study "Getting Fat on Government Cheese: The Connection Between Social Welfare Participation, Gender and Obesity in America" (PDF).
- Summarize the study in fewer than 40 words.
- Express the study's key term(s) in language a lay audience can understand.
- Evaluate the study's limitations. (For example: Do the results conflict with those of other reliable studies? Are there weaknesses in the study's data or research design?)
- Write a lead (or headline or nut graph) based on the study.
- Spend 60 minutes exploring the issue by accessing sources of information other than the study. Write a lead (or headline or nut graph) based on the study but informed by the new information. Does the new information significantly change what one would write based on the study alone?
- Interview two sources with a stake in or knowledge of the issue. Be prepared to provide them with a short summary of the study in order to get their response to it. Write a 400-word article about the study incorporating material from the interviews.
- Spend additional time exploring the issue and then write a 1,200-word background article, focusing on major aspects of the issue.