Valuing the greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power
In this era of global warming, the assertion that nuclear power is “carbon free” is a powerful one. Reducing emissions is crucial if global warming is to be combated, and renewable energies such as solar and wind aren’t yet produced in sufficient quantities to meet demand.
While nuclear power generation itself doesn’t produce greenhouse gases, what is often overlooked are the emissions over the entire lifecycle of a reactor. A 2008 National University of Singapore survey published in Energy Policy, “Valuing the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Nuclear Power,” looks at the more than 100 studies of greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power plants.
During their lifecycle, nuclear facilities emit greenhouse gases during the initial construction, when uranium ore is mined and processed, and waste treated. Finally, a reactor must be decommissioned at the end of its life and mines reclaimed.
Analyzing studies that worked to take these factors into account, the author concludes that:
- The mean value of carbon dioxide emissions over the lifetime of a nuclear reactor is 66 grams per kilowatt-hour of electricity.
- Nuclear power emits more greenhouse gases per kilowatt hour than all renewables, including biomass (up to 41 grams per kilowatt hour), hydroelectric and solar (up to 13 grams per kilowatt hour), and wind (up to 10 grams per kilowatt hour).
- Reactors produce significantly less carbon dioxide than all fossil fuels. The cleanest is natural gas (443 grams per kilowatt hour), while the most carbon dioxide is produced by coal (up to 1,050 grams per kilowatt hour).
The author concludes by stating that studies of greenhouse-gas emissions associated with nuclear power need to be more accurate, accountable, and transparent, and urges the development of a formal standard for reporting emissions.
Tags: coal, global warming, mining, nuclear power, nuclear waste, pollution, greenhouse gases
Read the National University of Singapore study titled "Valuing the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Nuclear Power."
- Summarize the study in fewer than 40 words.
- Express the study's key term(s) in language a lay audience can understand.
- Evaluate the study's limitations. (For example: Do the results conflict with those of other reliable studies? Are there weaknesses in the study's data or research design?)
Read the issue-related Washington Post article titled "Britain Seeks to Expand Nuclear Energy."
- If you were to rewrite the article based on knowledge of the study, what key changes would you make?
- Write a lead (or headline or nut graph) based on the study.
- Spend 60 minutes exploring the issue by accessing sources of information other than the study. Write a lead (or headline or nut graph) based on the study but informed by the new information. Does the new information significantly change what one would write based on the study alone?
- Interview two sources with a stake in or knowledge of the issue. Be prepared to provide them with a short summary of the study in order to get their response to it. Write a 400-word article about the study incorporating material from the interviews.
- Spend additional time exploring the issue and then write a 1,200-word background article, focusing on major aspects of the issue.